The Manuscript Below Has Entered the Review Process

Submitting an academic research commodity to a journal has been facilitated exponentially by the introduction of electronic/online submission. Once introduced, electronic submission quickly became the new standard. Not only is information technology easier for authors to submit their piece of work, merely it is easier for periodical editors and reviewers to edit and referee manuscripts, given the enhanced networking provided by online communication. Authors may submit manuscripts from whatsoever identify at any time. Conducting research in a remote location no longer proves to exist a claiming. As long as in that location is internet admission of some kind, a manuscript can exist submitted from virtually any place on the world.

In addition, with the ability to email materials instantly, reviewers tin be located anywhere in the world. Further, their exchanges with journal editors and staff are far more than efficient than in the by, making the review and editing procedure overall more than efficient. Conversely, they can instantly opt out of reviewing a detail manuscript and another reviewer can exist contacted immediately.

Tracking the Status of a Manuscript

Further developments in the online submission procedure assistance journals provide authors with admission to manuscript tracking systems, which allow them to follow the status of a manuscript equally it goes through the review process, mail submission. Importantly, authors no longer have to wonder where their manuscript is in the review process—these systems provide transparency.

Examples of unlike manuscript submission systems include ScholarOne (SAGE and some Nature Publishing Group journals), Editorial Manager (Springer, Wiley, PLOS, and more), and EVISE^® (Elsevier). These submission systems provide authors, editors, and reviewers with an efficient and easy-to-access method of checking the status of a manuscript; differ merely slightly in terminology and processing.

Hither'due south a quick guide to various stages a manuscript undergoes postal service submission. Annotation that different terminologies may exist used by journals and publishers.

Related: Submitted your manuscript to a journal? Bank check out this mail on steps to follow after submission!

Submitted to Periodical: This status means that the manuscript has been submitted to the journal. The manuscript is and so screened to ensure that it meets the specified formatting requirements before it is assigned to an Editor.
Technical Screening: The journal staff performs an initial bank check on the manuscript to ensure that the manuscript has been prepared per author guidelines specified on the journal website. If the manuscript does non meet the journal requirements, the manuscript may exist returned to the writer to make the required changes.
With Editor: This indicates that an Editor has been assigned. The Editor checks to see if the manuscript fits the scope of the journal, assesses if the inquiry meets the journal's quality standards. If the manuscript clears the screening, it is sent for review; in instance the manuscript does not meet journal standards, information technology is immediately rejected without review.
Reviewer Invited: The Editor identifies reviewers to assess the manuscript and provide their comments. Note that this means that the reviewers have been invited, but the reviewers have non necessarily accepted to review the manuscript.
Nether Review: This status indicates that the manuscript has entered the review process. Peer reviewers now appraise the written report and provide their comments. The review procedure may take a few weeks or even months. While journals accept a specific review menstruation in identify, the reviewers may sometimes exceed these timelines. Authors may arroyo the journal's Editorial office to check on the condition of the manuscript and request for an expedited review in case the specified review menstruation has lapsed.
Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews have been completed. The Editorial office receives the reviewer comments and assesses them. This is then sent to the Editor-in-Chief for a final decision.
Decision in Procedure: This means that the reviewer comments are being assessed and the Editor-in-Principal is in the process of finalizing a conclusion well-nigh the manuscript.
Revise: The authors are asked to brand a few changes to the manuscript, based on reviewer comments. The changes suggested may be pocket-size or major – based on which the journal ordinarily provides a deadline for submitting the revision.
Revised Manuscript Submitted: The revised manuscript along with a rebuttal letter of the alphabet has been submitted to the periodical afterward addressing reviewers' comments.
Completed – Pass up: This condition indicates that based on the reviewers' comments, the manuscript has been rejected. In some cases, journals may offering to transfer the manuscript to some other journal where the manuscript fits the scope better.
Completed – Accept: This usually indicates that the Editor has found the revised manuscript to exist satisfactory and the manuscript has been accepted for publication. The article is then handed over to the publisher to handle the publication process. The final proofs of the accepted article are sent to the corresponding author for a final check before publication. Once the author finalizes the article proofs, the article is published in the journal issue.